River Restoration – Hydromorphological Assessment and River Restoration Plan for the Waters of LIFE Islands Demonstration Catchment

Tender

https://irl.eu-supply.com/ctm/Supplier/PublicPurchase/241390/1

Carry out a hydromorphological assessment on the waterbodies within the Islands Demonstration catchment in order to understand current condition and the hydromorphological issues driving that condition, and to identify appropriate river restoration measures to mitigate those issues, considering multiple benefits.

The assessment should be based on a combination of desk based studies and targeted field investigations. Reference should be made to the output LAWPRO local catchment assessments

The successful tenderer will be required to carry out a hydromorphological assessment on the waterbodies within the Islands Demonstration catchment in order to understand current condition and the hydromorphological issues driving that condition, and to identify appropriate river restoration measures to mitigate those issues, considering multiple benefits. The assessment should be based on a combination of desk based studies and targeted field investigations. Reference should be made to the output LAWPRO local catchment assessments.


Relevant stakeholders should be consulted and environmental screening of proposed measures should be provided as required (EcIA, AA and NIS).


A comprehensive outline of the methodologies to be employed and the data sources to be consulted should be submitted along with a proposed timetable for completion of the various stage of the project (it is expected that the final report should be delivered within 3 months of the date of appointment).


The project deliverables will be:
– Final Hydromorphological Assessment Report and River Restoration Plan
– Relevant shapefiles, raw data and photographs

AIE: HydroSED

AIE Request

OCEI reference: OCE-130455-H2J9M1
UCD reference: AIE12_1_1015

“All environmental records relating to the ongoing HydroSED project to include, but not restricted to
• Methodology
• Interim Reports
• Preliminary findings
• Correspondence
• GIS data (in GIS format).”

Basis for refusal:

Methodologies outlined in the HydroSED Research Grant Proposal report and referred to in the Dr O’Sullivan’s correspondence file are being withheld in accordance with Article 9 (1)(d) of the AIE Regulations.

The premature release of this information at this time would seriously disadvantage the projects in question, UCD as Research Performing Organisation leading the research, and the funding provider, in financial, competitive and potentially commercial terms.

While the project is ongoing, it is important that this information is protected from release as there are real concerns that release of such comprehensive elements contained within the proposal into the public domain leave the project, including the location sites, timeframes, risks and proposed changes and anticipated deliverables at risk of being compromised.

Our funders hold the view that this information should only be released when the project has been completed and final report published.

Release of our project proposal could affect our ability to attain funding in the future.

Similarly the 6-month interim report and Year 1 Scientific Progress report, as per attached schedule, provide detailed updates on the project to our funder, DAFM and are withheld in accordance with Articles 9 (1)(d) and 9 (2) of the AIE Regulations.

These reports contain detailed updates to DAFM about the live and ongoing research being carried out and unfinished scientific data.

This scientific data also forms part of our PhD student’s degree, who is conducting research with the data. Early release of this information into the public domain, may lead to other parties deciding to use the data for their own benefit, which would seriously compromise our student’s thesis and PhD

Premature release of this data, which is subject to change over the course of the project, would have no significant meaning without the final findings and would be open to incorrect interpretation by other individuals which could negatively impact the project itself. For this reason, project data and project files contained within Dr O’Sullivan’s correspondence file have also been withheld/redacted.

Disclosure would adversely affect intellectual property rights. Release of records under the AIE regulations are considered as being released to the world at large and in doing so we must assume that release of information contained within the proposal and interim reports that are subject to intellectual property could be commercially exploited or used in a way that would constitute an unauthorised infringement of the intellectual property rights. In accordance with the terms of the project, any IP emanating from the project will be owned by the research performing organisations and access to industry parties will be via licensing which shall be on fair commercial terms, subject to overall State Aid, technology transfer and other legal or government policy considerations.

In line with DAFM’s commitment to ensuring that the research outputs are made available to all potential end users, it is expected that once the project is finished, expected completion date 31 August 2024, and the final report is published, then the results would be shared, contingent on the coordinator’s consent to publish.

In applying these exemptions, I have also considered Articles 10(3) and 10(4) of the AIE Regulations.

Factors in favour of releasing the information include,
• right of the public to have access information,
• the need for an open, transparent and accountable public service and
• the need for scrutiny of decisions.

Factors opposing release of the records into the public domain include,
• protecting the integrity of university processes,
• maintaining confidentiality of IP rights,
• protection of unfinished research and material in the course of completion and,
• protection of the university’s ability to secure future funding for similar projects.

Having weighed up all factors, I have determined that the public interest would be best served by not disclosing the information.

EPA QUBE hydrological assessment tool

https://www.catchments.ie/inside-the-epa-episode-1-hydrometric-and-groundwater-unit/

https://www.epa.ie/our-services/monitoring–assessment/freshwater–marine/rivers/water-level-and-flow-data/

Majority of sensors are EPA or OPW

Irish Water sensors not on the map ? eg sensors on Vartry ?

https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/freshwater–marine/national-hydrometric-monitoring-programme-.php

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=EPA+QUBE+hydrological+assessment+tool&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart#d=gs_qabs&t=1657811264771&u=%23p%3DVPklk9eaMVAJ

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=EPA+QUBE+hydrological+assessment+tool&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart#d=gs_qabs&t=1657811322872&u=%23p%3DChwjNK1TifUJ

How is hydromorphology addressed in river conservation projects, eg in this example within the EU funded LIFE projects?

Hydromorphology is a relatively new discipline which is described in the Water Framework Directive. It refers to the physical character of the river and includes the flow of water in the river, the course the river takes or the form and shape of the river channel.

It stems from the term ‘fluvial geomorphology’, a subject that focuses on the processes of water and sediment movement and the features that these processes create in a river such as pools, riffles and glides. These processes and features create and maintain habitats for invertebrates, fish and plants.

Hydromorphology pressures are anything that impacts negatively on the form or flow of the a river, for example: weirs and dams which may impede fish passage; drainage works which straighten and deepen the channel and thereby damage important habitat features for aquatic species and soil or bank erosion which can cause siltation of the river bed.

Changes to the hydromorphological characteristics of surface waters is estimated to be a significant pressure in almost 29% of high status objective waterbodies that are At Risk of not meeting their environmental objectives. It is the most prevalent significant pressure within high surface objective water bodies.

Two of the catchments selected within the €20 million Waters of LIFE project deal with hydromorphology

River name: The Shournagh

Water Framework Directive Reference: Lee SC 060

Location: Co Cork (near Tower and Blarney)

Significant Pressures: Agriculture, Hydromorphology, domestic wastewater, urban runoff, OPW Area for Action

River name: The Awbeg

Water Framework Directive Reference: Blackwater SC 060

Location: Co. Cork (Near Kanturk)

Significant Pressures: Agriculture, Hydromorphology