Elusive Quarries: A Failure of Regulation

Quarries are economically important. Particularly (but not only) in times of economic growth, there is a need for the raw materials provided by quarries for the construction industry. However, quarries – depending on their scale and location – can cause significant environmental impacts. It is therefore necessary to control quarrying activities in order to ensure environmental protection.

Quarries have been the subject of regulation under the Local Government (Planning and Development) Acts 1963-1999 and the Planning and Development Acts 2000-2010. Yet quarries have proved resistant to the type of regulation provided under those Acts. The central submission of this Article is that it is time to start afresh.

The purpose of this Article is not to provide a comprehensive account of the law relating to quarries. Several of the issues addressed in this Article could each provide material for an Article of greater length than this one.

Rather, this Article has three aims.

First, it seeks to draw together different aspects of planning law insofar as they apply to quarries. This will provide a structural account of complicated interlocking mechanisms of quarry regulation.

Second, the Article offers an analysis and critique of the complexity of this interlocking system of regulation. When one looks at the core substantive elements of the regulation of quarries, it becomes immediately apparent that the Oireachtas and the courts have created a system of labyrinthine complexity that does not serve the interests of either quarry operators or the environment. Third, the Article offers a proposal for reform which, it is contended, could provide a far simpler system of regulation that would benefit both the environment and quarry operators themselves.


[1] For an account of these competing concerns, see Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Quarries and Ancillary Activities: Guidelines for Planning Authorities (Stationery Office, 2004).

[2] Readers should refer themselves to the two excellent textbooks in this area: Yvonne Scannell, Environmental and Land Use Law (Thomson Round Hall, 2006) and Garrett Simons, Planning and Development Law (2nd ed, Thomson Round Hall, 2007). In addition, the volumes of the Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal contain many articles providing detailed analysis of legal developments. Reference is made below to a number of specific articles.

http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/75402/The%20Regulation%20of%20Quarries.doc?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Use of constructed wetlands for treating mine waste leachates – predicting longevity and management implications

Project AttributeProject Details
Project TitleUse of constructed wetlands for treating mine waste leachates – predicting longevity and management implications
EPA Project Code2018-W-DS-32
Lead OrganisationUniversity of Limerick (UL)
CoordinatorRonan Courtney
EPA Research 2014 – 2020 Theme(s)Water: Theme 3: Innovative Water Technologies
EPA Research Pillars
Project Start and End DatesStart: 01/03/2019
End (if applicable): 29/02/2020
Revised End Date (if applicable): 29/08/2020
EPA Project TypeDesk Study
EPA Award TypeSTRIVE – Project Based Awards
Current Project StatusGrant Awarded
Total Funding Amount70093.80
Project Abstract/DescriptionConstructed wetlands (CW) are increasingly employed for leachate treatment as part of closure planning for mine sites; however their life expectancy and longevity of performance is relatively unknown and no long-term studies have been carried out in Ireland. This proposed study will develop an international database on the use of CW systems treating mine wastes with the objective of identifying key operating parameters and longevity of such systems. Through sampling and analysis of established CW systems at Boliden Tara Pb/Zn mine and Rusal Aughinish alumina processing plant, a series of soil saturation index studies will contribute to our understanding of the removal mechanisms for contaminants of concern. Additionally the influence of leachate characteristics (e.g. pH, suspended solids, predominance of metal types) on removal efficiencies will be investigated. Understanding the capacity of CW systems to treat these complex metal mixtures will contribute to assessing their expected lifespan and the requirements for intervention and management post-closure. This project directly relates to the current EPA research strategy, in particular its requirement to mitigate the negative environmental, social and health impacts of the raw materials sector. This project will produce a report and database (placed in the EPA SAFER database) of key wetland process parameters and operational mechanisms, a final project report, three peer reviewed publications and a conference presentation. In addition, a post-project dissemination workshop will take place involving interested parties from bodies such as the EPA, BRAVO – Critical Raw Materials, and the research community. The project will also enable research capacity building where outputs are expected to contribute to proposal submission for upscaling and translating into demonstration pilots with industry partners, e.g. ERA-MIN submission.
EPA Scientific OfficerLisaJohnson

Why are we losing Blue Dots?

Generally Blue Dot waters tend to be in the upper section of river catchments. For this reason, they are affected by some land use activities more than others. In addition to this Blue Dot waters are more commonly found along the Western seaboard and in mountainous areas e.g. Wicklow and Slieve Bloom Mountains. The dominant land uses in these areas are Forestry, Agriculture and Peat extraction and low density one off housing.

The profile of pressures that impact on our Blue Dots is slightly different to the pressures impacting on our Good Status water bodies. While agriculture is the most significant pressure on our good status waters, forestry is the most significant pressure on our Blue Dot waters. Forestry is a pressure on 51 (40%) of our Blue Dot waters, followed by hydromorphology in 43 (34%) water bodies, agriculture in 35 (28%) water bodies, peat extraction or disturbances in 16 (13%) water bodies and domestic waste-water in 13 (10%).

Activities that impact on our Blue Dot waterbodies in order the number of waters that are affected:

  1. Forestry
  2. Hydromorphology
  3. Agriculture
  4. Peat
  5. Other
  6. Domestic WWTP
  7. Urban WWTP
  8. Industry
  9. Mines and Quarries

http://www.lawaters.ie/bd-location-and-pressures/