Sewage Sludge and Biosolids

The treatment of the wastewater generated in greater Dublin by homes, schools, businesses and industry produces wastewater sludge.

Wastewater sludge is made up mainly of organic matter that has been removed from the wastewater during the treatment process. Further treatment of this sludge is required to enable its safe and efficient re‐use or disposal.

The further processing of the sludge results in ‘biosolids’. Biosolids are a biologically stable product free of harmful pathogens (viruses, bacteria etc.) and containing high levels of plant nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus etc.). The treatment of sludge happens at the wastewater treatment plant.

Biosolids are then transported to a biosolids storage facility prior to being outputted for use in agriculture and forestry.

Most of the biosolids produced in Ireland (98%) are currently reused on agricultural lands as a soil conditioner and as a replacement for chemical fertilisers.

The use of biosolids on agriculture lands is strictly regulated under European and National law.

One of the conditions of use is a strict prohibition on spreading biosolids on land over the winter period (October to January).

This restriction means that biosolids reused in agriculture need to be stored for certain periods over each calendar year.

Note from 5th Nitrates Action Plan on Sewage/Industrial Sludges


The use of sewage sludge is managed by Irish Water through its National Wastewater Sludge Management Plan.

The application of sewage sludge to agricultural land is controlled by local authorities through the maintenance of sludge registers and inspection/enforcement programmes.

The EPA regulates industries (including dairy processing and animal slaughtering) that generate industrial sludges through IED licences.

The application of industrial sludges as an organic fertiliser to agricultural land is controlled under the Good Agricultural Practice regulations.

However currently there is not an integrated approach or data system available that identifies the loads and spreadlands where sludges are applied.

A comprehensive understanding of the movement of sludges and the application of sludges to agricultural land is required to ensure the existing controls are fit for purpose.


A review of the management and oversight of sludges being applied to land will be carried out by a working group established under the National Technical Implementation Group (NTIG), which is part of the River Basin Management Planning and Water Framework Directive governance structures.

Recommendations arising will be brought back to the WFD governance structures for consideration.

Water Policy Advisory Committee Meetings – 2019 to 2021

The Water Policy Advisory Committee (WPAC), established pursuant to S.I. 350 of 2014, provides policy advice and assistance to the Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and on broader water resource issues.

WPAC is also responsible for providing advice on and support for the making of River Basin Management Plans, including the programmes of measures as part of those Plans.

WPAC also invites other organisations to present to it on topics of relevance, and it has decided to publish regular bulletins to provide an overview of issues under consideration.

However, as much of the Committee’s discussions are confidential as part of the wider deliberative process, these bulletins are general in nature.

WPAC Membership
Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government (Chair) (D/HPLG)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Office of Public Works (OPW)
Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI)
Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU)
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (D/AFM)
Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (D/CHG)
Department of Health (D/H)
County and City Management Association (CCMA)
Health Service Executive (HSE)
Irish Water (IW)
Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI)

Note: nothing substantive that’s not available / mentioned via multiple other sources, aside from:

D/HPLG provided information on the new oversight group for the ASSAP.

Abstractions Bill – pre-legislative scrutiny stage on the 20th October 2020

Shannon catchment – fish passage Ardnacrusha / Parteen – Roadmap for the implementation of potential solutions was close to completion, and with the Steering Group by end of 2020

Programme of Measures Gap Analysis mentioned. Unclear if these gap analysis reports have been published by EPA. References main issues of Nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and hydromorphology (drainage, sediment and barriers) so worth following up.

Norovirus

Source: BIM presentation at WFD National Technical Implementation Group

Norovirus impact on shellfish waters.

Norovirus comes from human sources so urban waste water and stormwater overflows are the key
significant pressure where there are impacts.

A targeted approach is needed and will need to reflect future higher standards.

NTIG discussion on the scale and type of technical characterisation work needed to identify the sources of norovirus in the catchments of the impacted waters.

LAWPRO are proposing a detailed characterisation in the catchment of the Clarinbridge Shellfish area where there are issues.

Clarinbridge Kinvarra Bay Final Characterisation Report

Clarinbridge Kinvarra Bay PRP 2012 – Updated

Clarinbridge Kinvarra Bay Final PRP

Clarinbridge Kinvarra Bay Map



Athy Stream: Silt, Sediment and River Restoration Project

Athy Stream: Widespread sediment issues have been identified.

Ongoing work by ASSAP may help reduce the amount of new sediment entering the stream.

However, this will not resolve issues with historic sediment and possible impacts from historical straightening of the channel. There may be need for additional restoration work on this river, however as yet there is no framework for river restoration measures in these scenarios.

These works can be expensive.

No AFA report on catchments.ie

No LAWPRO desktop report publsihed to date

Specific Hydromorphology Issues, eg Morrell_020

HYMO issues

LAWPRO have identified PAAs where chemistry may be within the EQS, but there are issues with the ecology.

An example of this is the Morrell_020.


Specific measures for these types of settings would need to be identified and implemented for these areas if there is to be an improvement in status

Pre AIE question: list of catchments where HYMO is dominant issue, where OPW works are current/in planning stages, or where improvements have been identified

Physical habitat modifications as a result of flood alleviation works are additional significant pressures on Morrell_020, Morrell_030

Nanny PAA: Upstream Nutrient Pollution

Source: WFD National Technical Implementation Group, Minutes May 2020

“Nanny PAA: Initial Local Characterisation Assessment has identified nutrient issues in the PAA, however these issues are coming from an upstream area that is not within this PAA. Therefore, ASSAP are not currently working in these areas. At present, LAWPRO do not expect improvement in this PAA by the end of the 2 nd Cycle in 2021. Hence, the Nanny should be considered as a PAA for Cycle 3 with an enlarged catchment area that includes these upstream areas with nutrient issues”

Desktop study for Lower Nanny

Note: list of PAAs where catchment assessment is impacted by pressures upstream of the area under consideration

WFD National Technical Implementation Group: Membership

Membership as at Mar 2021:

Alan Dunney, CAROs

Andy Fanning, EPA

Anne Marie O’Connor, ABP

Anthony Mannix, EPA

Aoife Crowe, CER

Barry Deane, NFGWS

Bernard Harris, DAFM

Bernie O Flaherty, LAWPRO

Bernie White, LAWPRO

Billy O Keeffe, TII

Brian O Loan, BIM

Carol McCarthy, LAWPRO

Cathal Gallagher, IFI

Catherine Butler, BIM

Claire Colman, Irish Water

Clare Casey, DAFM

Cliona O’Brien, NPWS

Colin Byrne, DHPLG

Conor Galvin, OPW

Daireann McDonnell, Waterways Ireland

David Joyce, CCMA/Cork

Deborah Meghan, Coillte

Deirdre MacGabhann, ABP

Deirdre Quinn, NIEA / DAERA

Donal Grant, DHPLG

Dymphna Kehoe, DAFM

Eva Mockler, EPA

Evin McGovern, MI

Fran Igoe, LAWPRO

Gary O’Connell, LAWPRO

Graham McGovern, DHPLG

Imelda Averill, CCMA DCC

Jack Nolan, DAFM

Jenny Deakin, EPA

Joanne Gaffney, BIM

Joanne Livingstone, NIEA / DAERA

Karen Creed, EPA

Karl Kashen, LAWPRO

Ken Bucke, Forest Service

Kerry Anderson, NIEA / DAERA

Kevin Collins, Forest Service

Maeve Ryan, LAWPRO

Margaret Keegan, LAWPRO

Marie Archbold, EPA

Mark Adamson, OPW

Martin Cormican, HSE

Mary Gurrie, EPA

Matt Craig, EPA

Mike Murphy, BIM

Monica Lee, GSI

Niall Horgan, Irish Water

Noel Byrne, EPA

Noel Meehan, Teagasc

Noreen Mc Cleery, NIEA / DAERA

Oonagh McCann NIEA / DAERA

Paddy Morris, EPA

Pat Murphy Teagasc

Patrick Morrisey, EPA

Paula Treacy, WI

Peter McGoary, SFPA

Philip O’ Dea, Coillte

Ray Spain, LAWPRO

Richard Gray NIEA / DAERA

Ruth Hennessy, LAWPRO

Serena Keane, Irish Water

Shane O’ Boyle, EPA

Silke Hartmann, NIEA / DAERA

Stephen Fennell , EPA

Suzanne Wylde, EPA

Shellfish Waters: Plans to Address Water Quality Issues

Source: NTIG Minutes, March 2021

Minutes highlight a number of issues with shellfish water quality

There are gaps relating to shellfish water when compared to other protected areas and pressures on these shellfish areas is increasing” BIM

LAWPRO
• Marine issues have been raised at ROCs and AFA workshops.
• Marine Working group established: this will progress issues locally where possible and escalate issues not solvable locally though WFD governance structures.
• There can be a lack of alignment between WFD ecological status and other indicators (e.g WFD does not look at E.coli or source of pathogens)
EPA –Protected Area Characterisation
• The EPA is taking a risk-based approach to the characterisation of Protected Areas, including bathing waters, drinking waters and shellfish waters. The risks for these protected areas are related to impacts on public health rather than ecological health, and so different data sources, models and tools are required.


BIM
• There are gaps relating to shellfish water when compared to other protected areas and pressures on these shellfish areas is increasing

DHLGH – Roadmap for the replacement of the repealed shellfish regulations
• The shellfish regulations were repealed in 2013.
• These regulations had designated 64 areas; new areas currently cannot be designated as there is no legislation to do so.
• The Marine Institute is currently monitoring these designated areas.
• A Statutory Instrument is being developed.
• DHLGH is looking at specifying monitoring and assessment requirements (threshold levels, EQSs); this will be informed by current Marine Institute work and reviewed by the national aquatic environmental chemistry working group