Agricultural Sustainability Support and Advisory Programme (ASSAP) Interim Report #2 | 2020

The second Agricultural Sustainability Support and Advisory Programme (ASSAP) interim report, from Teagasc and Dairy Sustainability Ireland, focuses on the continued provision of the ASSAP advisory service and interaction with farmers up until the 31st December 2020.

Progress was made on identifying issues in PAA’s and the implementation of actions on farms with 1,810 farms assessed in total and 391 follow up farm visits conducted. This is despite the impact the Covid 19 pandemic had on the implementation of the programme in 2020 due to restrictions on farm visits.

Diffuse losses of phosphorus (P), sediment and nitrogen (N) to waters continue to dominate as water quality pressures. The loss of P through overland flow, nutrient management, buffers and livestock access to watercourses were identified as key issues contributing to the pressures on waters.

Notes from WFD National Technical Implementation Group minutes (Feb 2020)

ASSAP (Noel Meehan)


o ASSAP are making steady progress with 1247 farm visits and assessments made, and 80 farmer meetings in 68 PAAs.
o There has been a very high level of engagement (96%) although this is expected to slip slightly in future because initial contact has been made with existing Teagasc clients. 90% of farmers who engage have agreed to implement measures.
o 75% of the pressures are from diffuse sources. The main issue is phosphorus reaching watercourses via overland flow on saturated soils and sedimentation which has been found to be a greater issue than expected. There is generally poor implementation of nutrient management plans. Moving drinking water access points and installing stream fencing are among the most challenging measures to implement, with a 50% refusal rate, because of the costs, prospect of a future grant, and/or properties being rented.

o Where new buffer margins are recommended by ASSAP in a PAA, the area inside the fence remains eligible for the basic payment scheme which is a significant recent change that should help to provide an incentive.
o The issues around data protection have been resolved but require a legislative amendment so they can be implemented.
o The focus for the coming months is to concentrate on revisiting farmers to assess whether the measures have been implemented.
o ASSAP advisors are exchanging knowledge and cross-pollinating with other Teagasc advisors. For example, 160 discussion groups have had ASSAP advisor input and there has been integration and training with the other advisors

LAWPRO AIE Request: Priority Areas for Action (PAAs) 21/10/2021

FOI-0421-2021 ( Submitted to AIE@housing.gov.ie who redirected to david.coleman@tipperarycoco.ie ) 1/11/21

“Under the AIE Regulations 2007-2018, please provide any communications which identifies the measures listed as “Quick Wins” by LAWPRO catchment scientists and passed on to ASSAP for action


For context:

LAWPRO catchment scientists work in specific catchment areas called Priority Areas for Action (PAAs)

The list of Proposed Areas for Action can be viewed here
https://lawaters.ie/app/uploads/2021/09/National-Area-for-Action-Report_3rd-Cycle-Appendix.xlsx

There is a complete lack of transparency regarding the individual measures proposed, implemented, monitored and reported by LAWPRO (and ASSAP)

My understanding is the LAWPRO catchment scientists (there’s approx 37 of them) walk catchments to spot problems and then pass these to ASSAP to engage with the farmers, landowners, etc

Link
https://lawaters.ie/our-team/#filter=*

I would like to determine where these ‘Quick Wins’ are documented, initially written up by the Catchment Team, how they are passed to the ASSAP Team, and where all this work is eventually documented to determine is a “Quick Win” turned out to be quick and/or a win

For the purposes of this request please consider the Quick Wins in the 2nd Cycle (2018 to 2021), unless the Quick Wins have already been worked on for the 3rd Cycle (2022 to 2027)

Water quality monitoring report on nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in Irish waters in 2020

Summary: This report provides an update on the results of water quality monitoring to support the assessment of the impact of the nitrate’s derogation on Irish waters, as required under Regulation 38 of the European Union (Good Agricultural Practices for the Protection of Waters) (Amendment) Regulations.

Click to access EPA_NItrogenandPhosporous_Concentrations_2020.pdf

Pig Farming, Nitrogen and Surface Water: Recent and Current An Bord Pleanala Cases

Ballyglassin and Corry, Carrickboy, Co. Longford.

Bord Pleanala No 301749 (June 2019) Refused

https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/301749

https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/301/r301749.pdf?r=143264

Dungummin Lower, Mountnugent, Co. Cavan

An Bord Pleanala No 305444 (June 2020) Granted

https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/305444

https://www.pleanala.ie/anbordpleanala/media/abp/cases/reports/305/r305444.pdf?r=354825

Curraheen, Ballymacoda, Co. Cork

https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/310053

Carrigroe Pig Farm, Carrigroe, Ballynamult, Co. Waterford

https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/310586

Caherbrack Pig Farm, Caherbrack, Ballynamult, Co Waterford

https://www.pleanala.ie/en-ie/case/310588

https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-40278437.html

FLARES – Fire, Land and Atmospheric Remote sensing of Emissions

Fires, Land and Atmospheric Remote Sensing of EmissionS (FLARES) aims to develop systematic approaches to the acquisition and collation of a range of data on agricultural and uncontrolled wildland burning burn events from satellite datasets.

These will be validated by in situ observations, and measurement of relevant emission factors for Irish wildfires, with the objective of improving the accuracy and reducing uncertainty in the quantification of annual greenhouse gas and particulate emissions.

The work builds on previous EPA-funded work to characterise upland habitats from satellite imagery, thus enabling the type of vegetation burned to be identified, and biomass lost to be calculated. The reliability of existing satellite and ground datasets will be evaluated, and proposals made for future operational air quality monitoring by drawing on the inter-disciplinary approaches of the Earth Observation and Atmospheric Chemistry expertise within the consortium.

Sectors in the bioeconomyExtracts from the All Island BioMap

The Irish Bioeconomy Foundation (IBF) is Ireland’s national bioeconomy association and innovation cluster. It was founded in 2017 to establish collaboration between industry, academia and policy makers that are involved in Ireland’s bioeconomy. One of the roles of IBF is to analyse the production processes of companies through the mapping of value chains and to promote mutually beneficial partnerships with those companies that have overlapping chains. To help with this task, the BioMap Project maps organisations relevant to the bioeconomy based on their feedstocks, waste streams and by-products. Hence, this approach will make it possible to identify overlaps and synergies between companies.

Green Deal targets for 2030 and agricultural production studies

Various studies, recently published, analysed possible effects of some elements of the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies on EU agriculture, including the Commission’s Joint Research Centre study.

The studies provide both the scientific community and policy makers with a valuable insight on the choice of policy tools to mitigate the risks. However, the models used in the studies all have their limitations.

They are not able to assess the full impacts of the two strategies and predict the future. For instance, the future consumer behavioural changes, the impact of research and innovation or technological uptake in the agricultural sector have not, or partially, been taken into account.

Nonetheless, the Commission welcomes the studies’ contributions to the debate and is committed to make this transition towards more sustainable food systems successful so that our food systems reduce their negative impact on climate change and biodiversity loss, while ensuring that farmers and consumers can benefit from it and our long-term food security is safeguarded.

The factsheet below presents an overview of each study and the elements considered.

ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/key_policies/documents/factsheet-farmtofork-comparison-table_en.pdf

Predicting which farms are most likely to breach nitrate pollution regulations

New research analyses which farms and farmers exceed emissions limits set by the EU Nitrates Regulations.

Violations are most likely when a farm business undergoes substantive change, perhaps via an alternative business model, expanded production, or the buying or selling of land.

Violations reduce water quality and lead to penalties for farmers.

Click to access RB202009_3.pdf