Legacy Sediment Contamination

Recent research presentation to Water Forum, by Irene O’Callaghan UCC, highlighted a huge knowledge gap on sediment contamination, recommendations led to discussion at CMSC.

More monitoring is needed, no regulations in place, would recommend pilot projects.

Lake sediment is an issue and there is lots of unpublished research in this area. It would be useful to collate this information.

Sediment is the 2nd most important pollutant in water after P. It is not well understood and is significant in lakes and estuaries but unsure about its significance in rivers.

Thanks to Irene O’Callaghan

PhD Candidate, MESA Research Group
School of BEES & School of Chemistry |University College Cork |

Assessing remote sensing as a tool to monitor hydrological stress in Irish catchments with Freshwater Pearl Mussel populations

Mathias Kuemmerlen, Evelyn A. Moorkens, Jeremy J. Piggott
Trinity Centre for the Environment, School of Natural Sciences, Department of Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

-Potential of remote sensing imagery to assess hydrological variables yet un-tapped.
-MSI is a suitable surrogate for soil moisture; NDVI for evapotranspiration.
-Indices show seasonal patterns for both land-cover types investigated.
-Reaction to severe drought diverges among indices and land-cover types.
-Open peat habitats’ regulating function is essential for functional FPM populations.

The West Coast of Ireland hosts many of the few populations of Freshwater Pearl Mussels (FPM) left in Europe. The decline of this keystone species is strongly related to deteriorating hydrological conditions, specifically to the threat of low flows during dry summers. Populations still capable of reproducing require a minimum discharge and flow velocity to support juvenile mussels, or else stress builds up and an entire generation may be lost.

Monitoring environmental and hydrological conditions in small and remote FPM catchments is difficult due to the lack of infrastructure. Indices derived from remote sensing imagery can be used to assess hydrological variables at the catchment scale. Here, five indices are tested as possible surrogates for soil moisture and evapotranspiration, based on two relevant land-cover types: open peat habitats (OPH) and forestry.

Selected indices are then assessed in their ability to reproduce seasonal patterns and in their response to a severe drought event. The moisture stress index (MSI) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were found to be the best surrogates for soil moisture and evapotranspiration respectively. Both indices showed seasonality patterns in the two landcover types, although the variability of MSI was significantly higher.

During the 2018 drought, MSI visibly increased only in OPH, while NDVI rose only for forestry. The results suggest that OPH enhances the long-term hydrological resilience of a catchment by conserving water in the peat substrate, while industrial forestry plantations exacerbate the pressure on water during drier periods. This has consequences for river discharge, freshwater biodiversity and specifically for FPM. Implementing these surrogates have the potential to identify land-use management strategies that reduce and even avert the effects of drought on FPM.

Such strategies are increasingly necessary in a climate change context, as recurring summer droughts are expected in most of Europe.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34626624/

QUBBES Peatland (Project Complete)

Quantification of Blanket Bog Ecosystem Services to Water (QUBBES) is an EPA funded research programme

This EPA-funded research project to quantify blanket bog ecosystem services (QUBBES) is currently investigating this issue and seeks to develop an approach(es) for blanket bog management that can facilitate existing economic activities, while deriving maximum benefit from ecosystem services.

Research will continue for the next 2.5 years, in which it will compare hydrological and water quality conditions in relatively intact sites with those from catchments where forestry/peat cutting/upland agriculture occurs, along with areas where restoration has been carried out.

https://www.facebook.com/qubbes/

NEROS Peatland (Project Complete)

NEtwork monitoring Rewetted/restored peatlands and Organic Soils for climate and biodiversity benefits

The NEROS project was funded by the EPA for two years starting January 2013 to set up a monitoring network of re-wetted/restored peatlands and organic soils in order to appraise their climate and biodiversity benefits.

Hypotheses

1) The current state of degradation of Irish peat soils will only deteriorate further without intervention – this will lead to further loss of ecosystem services including the regulating services (climate (C sequestration and C storage), water regulation as well as erosion protection), the cultural services (recreational, aesthetic, spiritual and educational) and the supporting services (biodiversity, soil formation, nutrient cycling)

2) Re-wetting and restoring peatlands and organic soils are co-benefit measures, complementary to nature conservation and protection which can enhance biodiversity and restore biogeochemical functions that are vital for the delivery of ecosystem services and a sustainable environment

3) By fully exploiting the synergy potential of the climate change-biodiversity nexus, re-wetting and restoring peatlands and organic soils will facilitate Ireland’s legal requirements under EU Directives and national legislation (Habitats Directive, Birds Directive, Flora Protection Orders, the CBD, Water Framework Directive and Landscape Directive)

Objectives

This project will establish a network of both degraded and re-wetted and restored peatlands throughout Ireland where we will be monitoring GHG fluxes and biodiversity components.  The ultimate aim is to provide high quality information to guide policy decisions in recognising the climate change-biodiversity nexus and its benefits in facilitating Ireland’s commitment to a more sustainable environment through the reduction of GHG emissions and conservation and sustainable use of a natural resource.

https://www.ucd.ie/neros/

AUGER – Peatland properties influencing greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals (Project Complete)

AUGER Project: peAtland properties inflUencing greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals This project is funded under the EPA Research Programme 2014-2020

Background

Peatlands have played an important role in climate regulation over the past 10,000 years. Pristine peatlands in Ireland are currently a small C sink (absorbing CO2 while emitting CH4) but represent less than 20% of the current national resource. Anthropogenic disturbances, mainly in the form of drainage (for agriculture and forestry) and peat extraction result in increased CO2 and N2O emissions, and reduced CH4 emissions. There are two options for mitigating GHG emissions from peatlands: avoiding new or recurrent drainage and reducing emissions on the existing drained areas. Climate policy instruments involving mitigation on peat soils are not being implemented in Ireland due to lack of basic information on the peatland resource and in particular its properties. This knowledge gap should be addressed in order to fully quantify the role of human activities on the climate footprint of Irish peatlands. Therefore the main objective of this project is to carry out a nationwide survey to document the properties of various types of peatlands and peat soils, how they are affected by various management options and how this influences the C and GHG dynamics of these systems, thereby quantifying the role of human activities on the climate footprint of Irish peatlands.

The key objectives of the project are as follows:

1) Review of Ireland’s need for C stock and GHG flux monitoring capacities on peatland sites; Identification of priority site types; Assessment of potential candidate sites for such network, including detailed information on current monitoring sites as well as proposed programme of monitoring activities.

2) Review of current models and tools used to assess peatland condition, and review of the significance of peatland properties and management in modelling GHG emissions.

3) Characterisation of peatland types (LUC) and their associated edaphic and ecosystem properties. This will build on existing data to identify potential gaps to be filled and will be further informed by a nationwide peatland survey of physical, chemical and ecological parameters of peatlands and peat soils (and overall assessment condition). Compilation of database regrouping all types of peatlands under existing LUC (including ‘natural’) and management.

4) Support of on-going field observations and modelling of GHG emission/removals at 2 core peatland sites: Moyarwood and Clara bogs.

5) Modelling of anthropogenic impacts on GHG emissions: development of ECOSSE model with collaboration from modelling specialists in Scotland (training of post-doctoral researcher), to allow Ireland to move to Tier 3 level of reporting.

Targets:

  1. Review of the requirements for a representative C observation network in Ireland including potential candidate sites.
  2. Proposed programme of measurement activities to reliably characterise C stocks and GHG emissions/removals.
  3. Database to include past and new field observations of all peat soils parameters; ecosystem properties and measurement protocols.
  4. Development of a field guide for rapid assessment of peatland condition.
  5. Field observations to supplement (a) existing GHG data and modelling database, and feed into WP3 database, GHG data to be used as independent validation of ECOSSE model outputs; (b) high resolution peat properties and (c) hydrological regime analysis.
  6. Model output and site validation of simulated GHG emission/removals from various peatland LUCD; national  upscaling of peatland GHG emission/removals (link with other project in this Call).
  7. Knowledge capacity building available to EPA.
  8.  Four open-access peer-reviewed papers and four conference proceedings.

 ‌

This 36 month project is based around 5 WPs with the project management led by University College Dublin (UCD) and partners in University of Limerick (UL), Trinity College Dublin (TCD) and Queen’s University Belfast (QUB), with input from Earthy Matters Environmental Consultants (EM). Find out more about the AUGER team here

Read about the project in the issue 1.2017 of Peatland International

 AUGER poster presented at the IPS Aberdeen 2017

Poster

 “This project is funded under the EPA Research Programme 2014-2020. The EPA Research Programme is a Government of Ireland initiative funded by the Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment.”

Smart Bog Project

Clara Bog

Environment Tools

Investigation into the Irish peatlands is fundamental into the development of tools for the wider environment and understanding the global carbon stocks including their effect on national and global carbon emission levels. This project is unique in its aims of determining the driver environmental variables which shape the carbon cycle of the peatland ecosphere and model the effect on the surrounding environment.

Sensor Platforms

Recent advances in sensors and sensor platforms for data collection present new ways to survey our environment. This project harnesses the Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm for environmental sensing focusing on investigating solutions to key impediments to implementation such as cost, suitability and data integrity.

Satellite Data Fusion

Collating and fusing data from satelllite imagery and that from in situ environmental monitoring solutions effectively remains an open challenge for environmental sciences. Investigating links between satellite imagery and data collected from on site sensors is a major focus for this project. The main goal is to discover proxy measurements through imagery that can act as an indicator to determine the true value on the ground.

Data Collection and Presentation

Environmental monitoring and data collection is central to the projects goals. All ongoing data collected during the project will be documented and made publicly available.

http://smartbog.com/

EHE Researchers Awarded $1.9 Million by EPA to study Potential Risks from Pollutants in Biosolids Study to look at occurrence and uptake of contaminants as well as health risks

A team of Johns Hopkins researchers in the Department of Environmental Health and Engineering has been awarded $1.87 million from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to study contaminants in treated sewage sludge, or biosolids.  

The team, led by Carsten Prasse, will identify and measure organic pollutants in biosolid samples, trace their movement in agricultural run-off and leaching, and quantify their uptake into food crops. Using advanced modeling approaches, the team will also estimate people’s health risks due to exposure to these compounds through farm contact and from eating food grown with biosolids. 

Since the banning of ocean dumping in 1991, biosolids have been increasingly applied to agricultural land, forests, parks, golf courses, home gardens, and lawns.   

“We know very little about the organic chemical contaminants in biosolids,” Prasse says. “This information is critical to the development of strategies to understand exposure and potential public health risks.” 

Biosolids are created during the wastewater treatment process. When biosolids are spread on agricultural land, they add nutrients, improve soil, and enhance moisture retention. Applying biosolids to land has economic and waste management benefits, since it saves space in landfills, recycles a waste product, and reduces demand for synthetic fertilizers. 

We know very little about the organic chemical contaminants in biosolids. This information is critical to the development of strategies to understand exposure and potential public health risks. – Carsten Prasse

Biosolids can also contain a variety of pollutants. Some of the main offenders: per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which are found in non-stick cookware, carpets and food packaging; triclosan, an antimicrobial found in personal care products; and unmetabolized pharmaceuticals. 

“The use of organic chemicals like PFAS and antimicrobial chemicals has dramatically increased over the last 10 to 20 years,” Prasse says. “But regulation of biosolids is so far almost exclusively focused on pathogens and inorganic contaminants such as metals.” 

Utilities and states need information on these pollutants to ensure that they are processed, handled, and used in a way that minimizes potential harm. The research has implications for consumers and farm workers, who may be exposed to biosolids through various pathways. 

The research team includes Keeve Nachman and Thomas Burke. Nachman will apply computational toxicological tools to assess the potential toxicity of unstudied chemicals. Burke, who chaired the National Academies of Science Committee on Biosolids Applied to Land in 2001, will advise the project and lead the team’s advisory board, which includes representatives from the biosolids industry, farmers and farm associations, and regulators.  

“Our project has a solid foundation in the laboratory, but we will directly engage with stakeholder and regulatory communities beyond the scientific community to ensure our research can inform waste management-related public health interventions,” says Prasse.  

Arming consumers and regulators with information can make biosolids safer, but Prasse says it can also help inform what goes into consumer products in the first place. 

“We need to think about the chemicals we use in our households and industries that are potentially problematic, why we use them, whether we really need them, and can we just take them out,” he says. 


The Department of Environmental Health and Engineering (EHE) is a collaborative hybrid under the Whiting School of Engineering and the Bloomberg School of Public Health. This cross-divisional department is uniquely designed to lead pioneering research and prepare the next generation of scholars to solve critical and complex issues at the interface of public health and engineering. 

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/ehe-researchers-awarded-19-million-by-epa-to-study-potential-risks-from-pollutants-in-biosolids

Harmony

Harmony is catchment based project that integrates research on soils and hydrology with socio-economic factors to derive locally relevant measures for agriculture in sensitive catchments.

The Harmony Project

Harmony is catchment based project that integrates research on soils and hydrology with socio-economic factors to derive locally relevant measures for agriculture in sensitive catchments.

The project is funded under the DAFM Stimulus fund and will provide research at post-graduate and post-doctorate level in catchment and socio-economic science.

Harmony is a collaborative project led by Teagasc research scientists from Johnstown Castle and Athenry, and in partnership with scientists from the University of Ulster, NUI Galway and AFBI.

Objectives and tasks

The overall objective of the project is to provide strategies for nutrient management in sensitive catchments.

To achieve this, the project will work within a number of case-study catchments to assess current nutrient management and farm practice in these areas (Task 2: farm survey).

A review of measures for sensitive catchments will also be carried out and a preliminary list of measures

The research element of the project will focus on optimising nutrient efficiency in the predominant soils in these areas (Task 3) and investigating the relationship between landuse change, hydrology and decline in high status (Task 4).

The outcomes of these tasks will be evaluated alongside a preliminary list of measures and a second and wider survey will explore the acceptance of additional measures and willingness to change (Task 5) among the farming community in these areas.

The project aims to propose management options and measures for agriculture that are locally relevant. It will engage with farmers through survey and discussion groups to evaluate the likelihood of adoption of new measures among the farming community.

Project team

Principal Investigator:

  • Karen Daly, ESLU Johnstown Castle, Wexford.

Project Partners:

  • Mary Ryan, REDP, Athenry
  • Prof. Philip Jordan, University of Ulster at Coleraine
  • Dr. Mark Healy, NUI Galway
  • Dr. Donnacha Doody, AFBI Newforge Lane, Belfast

ReformWater: Reducing the effects of peatland forest management to inland waters

Goal: The overarching aim of this study is to investigate less invasive practices to reduce the harmful effects of peatland forest management on inland waters under the increased demands for tree biomass and the threat of climate change.

https://www.researchgate.net/project/ReformWater-Reducing-the-effects-of-peatland-forest-management-to-inland-waters

http://@ReformWater_IE

https://www.peatlandsgathering.com/post/improving-water-from-managed-bogs-swamp-and-reform-water-projects

DROPLET (EPA Water Related Research Database): Excel Export

Note: DROPLET data has not been updated recently in light of the on-going EPA redevelopment works carried out on the database

Includes title of research project, principal investigator, institution/University, funding entity, project stat/end dates, duration of research, keywords and project abstract.

While incomplete, it is a useful starting point for anyone interested in Irish water research