EPA
AIE Refusal: OPW, National Flood Forecasting & Warning Service Steering Group
Sent to appeal, 8/2/25
AIE 134 Decision to Part Grant: Roscommon peat extraction (six identified sites)
I refer to your attached request, dated 17th December 2024, which you have made under the Access to Information on the Environment Regulations 2007 – 2018 (AIE Regulations) for access to the following:
· Records related to peat extraction on the following sites:
o Site RN1 – Aghafin, Co. Roscommon
o Site RN2 – Drumerr, Co. Roscommon
o Site RN3– Assaun and Castletown, Co. Roscommon
o Site RN4 – Derryhaurran East, Derryhaurran West, Churchquarter and Cloonconra Co. Roscommon
o Site RN5 – Monksland and Kilnamanagh
o Site RN6 – Cornaveagh, Co. Roscommon
Please include any internal CoCo records, any correspondence with the EPA and any correspondence with landowners and/or peat extraction contractors
Please restrict this AIE request to the years 2023-2024.
Your request is regarded as having been received by Roscommon County Council on 18th December 2024 as it arrived by email outside of office opening hours on 17th December 2024.
I also refer to my attached notice dated 16th January 2025 which informed you that I was extending the timeframe for dealing with your request to 17th February 2025.
Schedule of Records
I have attached a schedule of the following records that I consider to be relevant to your request:
· Records numbered 1 to 142 contained on Planning Enforcement File 2904;
· Records Numbered 1 to 19 in relation to correspondence between Roscommon County Council and the EPA.
This schedule provides an overview of my decision on the release of these records. The schedule provides a brief description of each record and also outlines the decision that I have made regarding access to each record. Where I have decided to part-grant or refuse access to a record, the schedule specifies the Articles of the AIE Regulations under which access to records/parts of records has been refused.
Decision
I have decided on 5th February 2025 to part-grant your request as follows:
Access Granted
I have decided to grant you full access to the following records as described in the attached schedule:
· Records numbered 1,3, 4, 6 to 19, 58, 61 to 70, 73, 74, 77, 114, 123 to 128, 130, 131, 133 and 142 contained on Planning Enforcement File 2904;
· Records numbered 1 to 8, 13, 17 and 18 of the correspondence between Roscommon County Council and the EPA.
Copies of the records to which full access is being granted are attached to this email.
Access Part-Granted
I have decided to grant you part access to the following records:
· Records numbered 2, 5, 21 to 57, 59, 60, 72, 75, 76, 78 to 113, 115 to 122, 129, 132 and 134 to 141 contained on Planning Enforcement File 2904;
· Records numbered 9 to 12, 14 to 16 and 19 of the correspondence between Roscommon County Council and the EPA.
Access to the redacted parts of the following records is being refused under Art. 8(a)(i) of the AIE Regulations as the disclosure of this information would adversely affect the confidentiality of personal information relating to a natural person who has not consented to the disclosure of the information, and where that confidentiality is otherwise protected by law:
· Records numbered 2, 5, 21 to 57, 59, 60, 72, 75, 76, 78 to 113, 115 to 122, 129, 132 and 134 to 141 contained on Planning Enforcement File 2904;
· Record numbered 19 of the correspondence between Roscommon County Council and the EPA.
Access to the redacted parts of the following records is being refused under Article 8(a)(iv) of the AIE Regulations on the grounds that disclosure of the information concerned would adversely affect the confidentiality of the proceedings of Roscommon County Council where confidentiality is otherwise protected by law (including the Freedom of Information Act 2014 with respect to exempt records within the meaning of this Act.)
· Records numbered 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15 of the correspondence between Roscommon County Council and the EPA.
The following provision of the Freedom of Information Act 2014 applies to prevent release to records numbered 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15:
· Section 29(1)(a) as the information concerned contains matter relating to the deliberative processes of a public body.
Access to the redacted parts of record numbered 16 in relation to the correspondence between Roscommon County Council and the EPA is being refused under the following:
· Article 8(a)(iv) of the AIE Regulations on the grounds that disclosure of the information concerned would adversely affect the confidentiality of the proceedings of Roscommon County Council where confidentiality is otherwise protected by law (including the Freedom of Information Act 2014 with respect to exempt records within the meaning of this Act.) In this regard Section 29(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2014 applies to prevent release to the information concerned as it contains matter relating to the deliberative processes of a public body.
· Article 9(2)(c) of the AIE Regulations on the grounds that a public authority may refuse to make environmental information available where the request concerns material in the course of completion, or unfinished documents or data.
Access Refused
I have decided to refuse you access to the following records:
· Records numbered 20 and 71 contained on Planning Enforcement File 2904.
Access to record numbered 20 is being refused under Article 8(a)(iv) of the AIE Regulations on the grounds that disclosure of the information concerned would adversely affect the confidentiality of the proceedings of Roscommon County Council where confidentiality is otherwise protected by law (including the Freedom of Information Act 2014 with respect to exempt records within the meaning of this Act.) In this regard the following provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 2014 apply to prevent release to the information concerned:
· Section 32(1)(a)(i) which provides for the refusal of a request where access to records could reasonably be expected to prejudice or impair the prevention, detection or investigation of offences, the apprehension of offenders or the effectiveness of lawful methods, systems, plans or procedures employed for the purposes of these matters;
· Section 32(1)(a)(ii) which provides for the refusal of a request where access to records could reasonably be expected to prejudice or impair the enforcement of, compliance with or administration of any law.
Access to record numbered 71 is being refused under Art. 8(a)(i) of the AIE Regulations as the disclosure of this information would adversely affect the confidentiality of personal information relating to a natural person who has not consented to the disclosure of the information, and where that confidentiality is otherwise protected by law.
Emissions
In reaching the above decision to refuse access to records/parts of records, I have in accordance with Article 10(1) of the AIE Regulations, examined whether your request relates to information on emissions into the environment and have determined that it does not.
Public Interest Test
Furthermore, in accordance with Article 10(3) and 10(4) of the AIE Regulations, I have weighed the public interest served by disclosure against the interest served by withholding access to records/parts of records. In this regard I have taken into consideration the following public interest factors:
Public Interest Factors Favouring Disclosure
Public Interest Factors Favouring Withholding Access
- Public interest in persons having a right of access to environmental information;
- Public interest in public bodies being open, transparent and accountable.
Personal Information
- Public interest in protecting privacy;
- Public interest in members of the public having a degree of personal privacy when they are dealing with public bodies.
Deliberative Processes
Public interest in protecting the integrity and viability of the deliberative and decision making processes of a public body.
Law Enforcement
· Public interest in ensuring that vital interests of the community are served by effective law enforcement and administration.
· Public interest in avoiding damage to investigations, processes etc.
· Public interest in preventing public bodies being impaired in the discharge of key responsibilities.
Having considered the above public interest factors, it is my opinion that those favouring the withholding of access outweigh those favouring the disclosure of the records/parts of records concerned. I have therefore concluded that the public interest would not be served by disclosing these records/parts of records.
Copies of Article 8, 9 and 10 of the AIE Regulations may be accessed at the following location:
- S.I. No. 133/2007 – European Communities (Access to Information on the Environment) Regulations 2007 (irishstatutebook.ie)
Copies of Section 29 and 32 of the Freedom of Information Act 2014 may be accessed at the following location:
Right of Review
Under Article 11 of the AIE Regulations you have a right to request an internal review of this decision. An internal review involves a complete reconsideration of the matter by a member of staff of Roscommon County Council, unconnected with the original decision, of the same or higher grade than the original decision-maker, who may affirm, vary or annul the original decision.
If you wish to request an internal review, you can do so by writing to Mr. Brian Duffy, AIE Officer, referring to this decision and quoting the above AIE reference number. This request must be made within one month of the date of receipt of this decision. The decision of an internal review will be communicated to you within one month of receipt of your request for an internal review.
Please contact me at 090 6637122 or email to aieoff@roscommoncoco.ie if I can assist you with any matter relating to your request.
Yours sincerely,
Brian Duffy
FOI, AIE, Data Protection & Ombudsman Liaison Officer
Corporate Services Department, Áras an Chontae, Roscommon, F42 VR98
DAFM Inspections at Ballinalee Pig Farm, Longford
AIE Request: Forestry Opportunities Map: Component Map Layers of the Opportunities Map
Forestry Opportunities Map “The right trees in the right places for the right reasons”
Dec 2024
Published by: Forestry Division, Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine. Johnstown Castle
Estate
The shp files are listed in the report as follows
Component Map Layers of the Opportunities Map include
- NPWS Designated Sites: Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), National Heritage Areas (NHAs),
Proposed NHAs, Special Protection Areas (SPAs), and National Parks. - Water Bodies: Streams, lakes, and reservoirs (sourced from the EPA landcover map).
- Existing landcover including urban areas and waterbodies: From the EPA landcover map.
- High Nature Value Farmland: Identified by Teagasc.
- Source Protection Areas and Drinking Water Abstraction Points: Mapped by the Geological Survey
Ireland (GSI). - High-Status Objective Waterbodies: Data from the EPA.
- Freshwater Pearl Mussel Catchments: Data provided by the NPWS
- Potentially Fisheries-Sensitive Areas: Compiled in consultation with the Inland Fisheries (see
Forestry Scheme Manual, July 2024). - Potentially Acid-Sensitive Areas (see Forestry Scheme Manual, July 2024).
- Areas with bird species of high conservation importance: Spatial data compiled from the NPWS and
BirdWatch Ireland. - National Monuments / Architectural Heritage: Data from the National Monument Service.
- Soils data: Provided by Teagasc
- Forest Productivity Map: Developed by Teagasc.
- Existing Forest Cover: Information from DAFM and Coillte
Data sources:
High Nature Value Farmland Teagasc – https://t-stor.teagasc.ie/handle/11019/1659
Coillte Subcompartment Database – Contact Coillte Directly (enquiries to
sharon.fitzpatrick@coillte.ie)
NPWS Designated Sites: Special Areas of Conservation (SACs), National Heritage Areas (NHAs),
Proposed NHAs, Special Protection Areas (SPAs), and National Parks – See https://data.gov.ie/ and
or https://www.npws.ie/maps-and-data
National Landcover Map -https://www.epa.ie/our-services/monitoring–assessment/assessment/mapping/national-land-cover-map/ and https://tailte.ie/en
Source Protection Areas and Drinking Water Abstraction Points see https://www.gsi.ie and or
https://data.gov.ie/
EPA High-Status Objective Waterbodies – see https://gis.epa.ie/GetData/Download
Freshwater Pearl Mussel Catchments: – See https://data.gov.ie/ and or https://www.npws.ie/maps-
and-data
National Monuments / Architectural Heritage: – See https://data.gov.ie/ or
https://heritagedata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=0c9eb9575b544081b0d2
96436d8f60f8
Soils data: – ISIS Map
Private Forests Database: – https://opendata.agriculture.gov.ie/dataset/dafm-private-forest-estate-
2023
No regulatory requirement for fencing below 170 kg N/ha grassland stocking rate
Under the Nitrates regulations (SI 113 of 2022 as amended) under Article 17 (18) it states
‘In the case of livestock holdings with grassland stocking rates of 170 kg nitrogen per hectare from livestock manure or above prior to export of livestock manure, bovine livestock shall not be permitted to drink directly from watercourses identified on the modern 1:5,000 scale OSi mapping or better. Where bovine livestock have direct access to watercourses on the holding, a fence shall be placed at least 1.5m from the top of the riverbank or water’s edge (as the case may be). It will be permissible to move livestock across a watercourse to an isolated land parcel where necessary, provided that both sides of the watercourse are fenced.’
It’s important to note that this requirement is based on grassland stocking rate prior to the export of organic manures. The grassland stocking rate is the organic N produced by grazing livestock on the grassland area of the holding, prior to exports of organic manures, and is based on the previous year’s stocking rate.
In addition, while there is no regulatory requirement for fencing below 170 kg N/ha grassland stocking rate, grant aid is available under Agri-environment schemes and has been for number of years.
So whilst it is true that there is no mandatory requirement to fence waterways for holdings with a grassland stocking rate below 170 kgs/N/ha, the regulations do place obligations to protect water and water quality on all farmers, for example, Article 17 of S.I. 113/2022 deals with distances from waterways in relation to both chemical and organic fertilisers.
AIE: DAFM and the development of standard emergency response procedures in relation to forestry
The Regulatory Review as part of Project Woodland, published in June 2022, contained the following Recommendations;
“The EIA Directive provides that Member States may, through their national laws, disapply the EIA Directive to projects which respond to a civil emergency if the Member State decides that applying the
EIA Directive would have an adverse effect on the environment. The Irish High Court has held that this provision applies only to projects responding to an unforeseen emergency, not to projects intended
to avoid foreseeable emergencies 71. The Habitats Directive and Birds Directive make no provision for projects responding to emergencies 72. The Water Framework Directive provides a very limited
derogation in response to extreme force majeure events.
- It is recommended that DAFM consult with the forestry sector and other key stakeholders and prescribed bodies on standard emergency response procedures, which will guide foresters planning for and responding to foreseeable emergencies such as storms, fire, disease etc. Standards may be subject to prior SEA screening and AA screening/AA, as required, prior to adoption. An afforestation licence application would be accompanied by a proposed emergency response plan, prepared in accordance with the standards. Once assessed and approved, it would be up-dated periodically (e.g. 3-5 years) or as frequently as required to take account of changes to the forest and the receiving environment and the different emergency risks which may emerge as the forest matures. The proposed emergency response plan would be part of the project that is assessed before the afforestation licence is granted.
- It is recommended that, pursuant to recommendation 14, the Forest Regulations may be amended to expressly exempt from the requirement for a licence any emergency works which are carried out substantially in accordance with an approved emergency response plan. DAFM should be given prior notice before the commencement of emergency works, and DAFM should reserve the right to step in and require a licence application to be made where it considers that there are likely significant effects which must be appropriately assessed before the works are carried out.
- It is recommended that the standard conditions to be attached to an afforestation licence should include an obligation to give DAFM prior notice of any proposed emergency works, and that such works shall be carried out substantially in compliance with the emergency response plan as assessed and approved by DAFM.”
Save Leitrim submitted an AIE request to DAFM after Storm Darragh;
We wish to receive under the AIE Regulations, in electronic format;
With reference to recommendations 17, 18 and 19 of the Project Woodland Regulatory Review (June 2022) (see below)
Information related to the development of standard emergency response procedures.
To include, but not restricted to, any consultations, actual or proposed, with
a) the forestry sector
b) other key stakeholders
c) prescribed bodies
To clarify, this could include any information related to consideration or discussion on the introduction of such procedures and changes to Regulation.
There is a very strong public interest case to be made for this information.
Note: Two and a half years after the publication of the Report DAFM cannot find any information which would suggest that there has been any consideration of Recommendations 17, 18 and 19 of the Regulatory Review. In failing to implement the Recommendations DAFM have left Ireland exposed in terms of compliance with European Law for the major clear-up operations that are ongoing in plantations across affected areas.

